bamdad wrote:
Dalton63841 wrote:
I think I can add that package and one for those on MBR to the customize screen. Then if they go GUID they check this one, and if they go MBR they check the other instead.
imho that would only complicate things. especially for noobs. ... I can't see anyone wanting mbr, since now windows can boot from a guid drive, too.
I think we should try to bring the different methods/scenarios together and clarify what's the limitations of each. Checking around, it seems that MS XP and Vista (32 bit) still cannot understand GUID natively. Only the later versions of Vista (64, server) and now the Windows 7 start to understand GUID.
So if I want to keep using the XP that came with the MSI U-100, I better keep the MBR scheme.
bamdad wrote:
why is this important for us? because GUID has a little hidden partition (around 200mb) at the beginning ('efi' partition), enabling us to put our kernel extension (.kext) and other boot-time overrides there
Yes. The hidden EFI is created automatically when we repartition using the GUID. BUT: Are you sure that we cannot 'fake' it and create a small partition under MBR, call it EFI, and put all our customized stuff there, as someone (Mars478?) suggested? [same way as we could use a separate partition to put GRUB there]
Dalton63841 wrote:
You can use a hacked version of Boot Camp, that can be found here if you are on SnowyWindOSX, because it does not use the EFI partition. The hacked Boot Camp Assistant formats the EFI partition, so if on Vanilla I dont suggest using.
I tried to look at the Boot Camp solution, but it seems that it is not a good solution for the long run. It takes advantage of the GUID/MBR Partition scheme hybrid, but is limited to only 4 'real' partitions (ie: Primary) (GUID/MBR hybrid cannot handle Extended partition and its Logical sub-partitions). Any future manipulation of the partitions such as moving, growing/shrinking, or adding partition will destroy the MBR-GUID synchronization.
So it seems that Boot Camp is not really a good solution in the long run.
Which bring me back to the need for the 'old' MBR scheme if we want to use the XP, until Windows 7 gains approval (remember Windows ME?)
What you'all think?